Why My Elementary School Dating Strategy Is Terrible Fundraising Advice
Back in elementary schoolāin the glorious awkwardness of the 1980sāI had a pretty sweet dating strategy. Maybe you remember it (or are guilty of using it) too.
Iād scribble a note that simply asked, āWill you go with me? Check yes, no, or maybe,ā then fold it neatly and pass it along, my heart pounding like Iād just diffused a nuclear bomb.
Fast-forward a few decades, and thankfully I learned a crucial fundraising lesson early in my career: Never phrase your donation ask as a yes-or-no question.
Turns out, what was terrible dating advice in the ā80s remains terrible fundraising advice today.
Why a yes-or-no donation ask creates an easy exit
Letās talk behavior psychology for a moment because as fundraisers and marketers, weāre essentially professional students of human decision-making.
Renowned behavioral economist Daniel Kahneman explains that our brains are designed to minimize effort and friction (Kahneman, 2011). Given an easy out, most people naturally take it.
Robert Cialdini, a leading expert on persuasion, reinforces this idea, suggesting clear, authoritative statements move people to action, whereas questions often give them permission to pauseāor worse, decline (Cialdini, 2006).
Think about how this plays out in fundraising. If your appeal asks, āWould you consider donating today?ā, you give donors a comfortable off-ramp.
Even if a donor is feeling generous, their brain seeks the path of least resistance. āWould you considerā¦ā introduces friction: the donor must actively weigh reasons, find justifications, or rationalize hesitation. Suddenly, saying ānoā becomes the simpler, faster option.
But what happens when you shift to, āGive today to save a lifeā? Thereās a stark contrast. Itās directive, clear, and purposeful.
You no longer ask the donor to do the hard work of making a decision. You just point out the correct action for them to take.
Thankfully, I learned this lesson early on
Iām grateful my early career included a mentor who helped me sidestep costly fundraising missteps.
Rick Dunham drilled into me the art and science of a successful ask, and he explained early on why yes-or-no phrasing was fundraising poison.
Since then, Iāve applied (and taught) this principle repeatedly, and have seen similar results across hundreds of campaigns.
I wasnāt just grateful for this fundraising best practiceāI was sold for life.
Neuroscience agrees: Donors need clear direction. Choices? Not so much.
Neuroscience strongly supports this principle.
As Iāve mentioned in an earlier post, Daniel Kahneman describes two distinct cognitive systems: System 1 thinking (fast, emotional, instinctive) and System 2 thinking (slow, rational, cautious) (Kahneman, 2011).
Effective fundraising taps directly into System 1: your message must bypass slow deliberation and quickly trigger emotion-driven action.
Directive statements like āGive now to provide clean waterā resonate quickly and emotionally. They spark instinctive responses.
This isnāt manipulationāitās smart, thoughtful communication.
Imperative statements tap directly into emotion, urgency, and subconscious triggers. They reduce cognitive strain and allow donors to act without hesitation.
When you help donors clearly see what matters, you remove unnecessary friction and guide them toward actions aligned with their values.
Exactly how to phrase your donation ask (so the donor canāt easily say no)
Enough theory. Letās get practical.
Here are some quick, actionable guidelines you can use right away:
ā āWill you give today?ā
ā āPlease give now to feed hungry families.āā āCould you support this important cause?ā
ā āGive now to protect endangered animals.āā āAre you able to join us in supporting this work?ā
ā āReady to save lives? Give today.ā
See the difference? Remove hesitation. Replace ambiguity with clear imperatives. Then your ask becomes powerful, confident, and much harder to dismiss.
If only Don Draper had written my elementary school notesā¦
Letās revisit my elementary-school romantic life one last time.
Imagine if, instead of timidly passing a yes-no-maybe note, Iād channeled my inner Don Draper. Rather than an uncertain āWill you go with me?ā, my note wouldāve boldly proclaimed:
āYou. Me. Letās be boyfriend and girlfriend. You wonāt regret it.ā
Okay, so Elementary-school Derek probably couldnāt have pulled that off, but Fundraising Derek? For sure he canāand so can you.
Ditch the yes-or-no habit. Be confident, direct, and clear.
Your donorsāand your resultsāwill thank you.
Sources:
Kahneman, Daniel. (Thinking, Fast and Slow.) Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Cialdini, Robert B. (Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.) Harper Business, Revised Edition, 2006.